screenpipe Review 2026: Local AI Memory, Pricing, and Privacy

An open-source, local-first memory layer for searchable screen and audio history

Recently checkedResearch BasedPaidProductivityAudioAutomation
Recently Updated

Advisor score

8.0/10

Documented editorial evaluation

Visit screenpipe

The decision

Should you choose screenpipe?

screenpipe earns a shortlist for technical, privacy-conscious users willing to own configuration and auditing. It is a poor fit for unmanaged corporate deployment or anyone unwilling to map exactly what is captured, retained, searchable, and sent outward.

Best for

Technical users wanting local activity recall; Open-source and local-model workflows.

Choose something else if

Unmanaged workplace surveillance; Devices containing unfilterable sensitive data

Evidence

Editorial research pending · 8.0/10

Pricing checked

From $400 · 2026-08-24

Free access is available, with limits.

The project is open source, but packaged desktop access and associated services have their own commercial terms; verify the current license boundary.

screenpipe offers unusually controllable local capture, search, MCP, and automation, but continuous recording creates serious consent, exclusion, storage, security, and review obligations.

Direct verdict

screenpipe earns a shortlist for technical, privacy-conscious users willing to own configuration and auditing. It is a poor fit for unmanaged corporate deployment or anyone unwilling to map exactly what is captured, retained, searchable, and sent outward.

What to verify

Use a separate device profile for one approved week. Exclude password managers, banking, personal messages, and sensitive client apps before capture. Measure recall precision, missed context, storage growth, CPU impact, redaction misses, deletion, pause reliability, model data paths, and whether MCP or pipes expose more context than intended.

Personal Recommendation

screenpipe earns a shortlist for technical, privacy-conscious users willing to own configuration and auditing. It is a poor fit for unmanaged corporate deployment or anyone unwilling to map exactly what is captured, retained, searchable, and sent outward.

Try the recommendation

See whether screenpipe belongs in your stack

Local-first and open-source architecture

Overall Score

8.0/10
Research Based
Last reviewed
Aug 24, 2026
Last updated
Aug 24, 2026

Editorial Review Framework

How screenpipe scores

Recently Updated

Overall Score

8.0

Ease of Use

8.2

AI Quality

8.0

Features

8.4

Speed

8.0

Integrations

8.2

Value for Money

7.8

Customer Support

7.8

Learning Curve

7.8

Recommended For

  • Technical users wanting local activity recall
  • Open-source and local-model workflows
  • Builders using REST or MCP

Not Recommended For

  • Unmanaged workplace surveillance
  • Devices containing unfilterable sensitive data
  • Users wanting zero-configuration privacy

Recommended Because…

Local-first and open-source architecture

Scores use a 0-10 editorial scale: 9–10 exceptional, 8–8.9 strong, 7–7.9 capable with material tradeoffs, 6–6.9 limited fit, and below 6 not recommended. Scores publish only when a documented evaluation supports them.

Open the optional evaluation worksheet

Reusable trial worksheet

Test screenpipe before you commit

Turn this review’s buyer test into evidence. Your entries autosave only in this browser and are never added to shared shortlist links.

0/7 checks complete
  1. Confirm the tool meets every must-have workflow and stakeholder requirement.

    Review starting point: Technical users wanting local activity recall; Open-source and local-model workflows; Builders using REST or MCP

  2. Run the same representative work you would use in production; do not score a polished demo.

    Review starting point: Complete three to five representative tasks with known acceptable outcomes and compare them with your current process.

  3. Calculate the effective cost per accepted result, including usage, review, corrections, and required add-ons.

    Review starting point: Official comparison documentation listed a $400 lifetime desktop price when reviewed. Local or cloud model costs, transcription, storage/sync, and team or enterprise arrangements can change total cost. Verify the checkout and exact included services before purchase. Reviewed August 24, 2026.

  4. Define an acceptance threshold, test known answers and edge cases, and record every correction.

    Review starting point: Editorial quality signals: features 4.2/5; AI quality 4.0/5. Validate these signals in your own work.

  5. Verify what data enters the product, who can access it, how long it is retained, and whether it trains models.

    Review starting point: Use approved low-risk data first. Check roles, consent, deletion, subprocessors, model-training settings, and the contract—not only the marketing page.

  6. Test the real handoffs, permissions, failure states, and export path your team depends on.

    Review starting point: Claude, ChatGPT, Codex, Ollama, Obsidian, Notion, n8n

  7. Record training, governance, reliability, accessibility, ownership, and change-management risks before rollout.

    Review starting point: Continuous recording creates high privacy risk; Optional cloud paths alter the data boundary; Technical setup and maintenance are substantial

Open Decision Workspace

Loading saved worksheet… · private to this device or your optional account

Product interface evidence

Visual evidence statusWhat we verified without a screenshot

Evaluation

Research-based

Price posture

From $400/month

Reviewed

2026-08-24

No authentic product screenshot is published for this review. DiscoverAI does not use generated interface images as product evidence.

Pricing

Paid
Free access
The project is open source, but packaged desktop access and associated services have their own commercial terms; verify the current license boundary.
Paid entry
From $400
Billing and plan model
Lifetime desktop license with optional model and service costs
Material limits
Official comparison documentation listed a $400 lifetime desktop price when reviewed. Local or cloud model costs, transcription, storage/sync, and team or enterprise arrangements can change total cost. Verify the checkout and exact included services before purchase. Reviewed August 24, 2026.

Editorial freshness

Recently checked

Pricing and material product claims were checked August 24, 2026.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Local-first and open-source architecture
  • Strong filters, API, MCP, and automation
  • Cross-platform capture

Cons

  • Continuous recording creates high privacy risk
  • Optional cloud paths alter the data boundary
  • Technical setup and maintenance are substantial

Best For

Technical users wanting local activity recallOpen-source and local-model workflowsBuilders using REST or MCP

Community evidence

How verified users put screenpipe to work

Structured, editor-moderated experience—not star ratings. This complements our independent review and never changes its score.

No approved community evidence yet. Be the first verified user to contribute.

Key Features

  • Screen capture
  • Audio transcription
  • Local search
  • Privacy filters
  • REST API
  • MCP
  • Pipes

Integrations

  • Claude
  • ChatGPT
  • Codex
  • Ollama
  • Obsidian
  • Notion
  • n8n

FAQs

Is screenpipe free?

The code is open source, while the packaged desktop product and optional services have commercial terms. Verify the current license and checkout before adoption.

Does screenpipe keep data local?

Local capture and storage are the default, but cloud models, transcription, sync, archive, connections, or LAN access change the data path.

What does screenpipe record?

It can capture screen content, accessibility text, OCR, input-related events where available, and audio transcripts, subject to configured filters and permissions.

Can screenpipe connect to AI assistants?

Yes. It documents MCP and API connections for compatible assistants, but those connections can expose sensitive history and should be tightly scoped.

Keep Deciding

Where to go next

Material changes only

Follow screenpipe

Get an occasional email when something decision-relevant changes. This is separate from the weekly newsletter.

Alert me about

Confirm by email · unsubscribe from any alert · no newsletter enrollment

Compare alternatives

See how similar tools stack up

Granola

Granola is a bot-free AI notepad that captures device audio, combines a transcript with a user's notes, and produces searchable meeting summaries

4.1

Granola is a bot-free AI notepad that captures device audio, combines a transcript with a user's notes, and produces searchable meeting summaries.

FreemiumProductivityTranscription

Recall.ai

APIs and SDKs for recording, transcribing, and streaming meeting data

4.0

Recall.ai removes much of the conferencing-integration burden for meeting products, but consent, bot reliability, transcription, storage, regional isolation, and total per-hour cost remain the buyer's responsibility.

PaidCodeMeetings

Mem

A practical AI tool for productivity workflows

4.5

Mem helps professionals improve productivity workflows with AI-assisted drafting, automation, analysis, or production features.

FreemiumProductivityWriting