AI meeting, field-report, email, and project operations for architects and engineers
Advisor score
Documented editorial evaluation
The decision
Cogram earns a shortlist for AEC firms with enough documentation volume to justify a specialized platform and a disciplined review process. Smaller practices should prove monthly time savings against the $79 entry price; larger firms should negotiate scope, governance, and deployment terms before rollout.
Best for
Architecture and engineering project teams; Firms standardizing minutes and field reports.
Choose something else if
Teams needing unsupervised final records; General-purpose meeting-note buyers
Evidence
Editorial research pending · 8.0/10
Pricing checked
From $79 · 2026-08-26
Free access is available, with limits.
No permanent free plan is listed. The individual plan advertises a 14-day free trial.
Cogram targets architecture, engineering, and construction workflows with meeting minutes, field reports, email, and project agents, but its $79 individual entry point and sales-led team packaging demand an outcome-based pilot.
Cogram earns a shortlist for AEC firms with enough documentation volume to justify a specialized platform and a disciplined review process. Smaller practices should prove monthly time savings against the $79 entry price; larger firms should negotiate scope, governance, and deployment terms before rollout.
Pilot one low-risk project for four weeks. Compare draft minutes, site reports, RFIs, submittal routing, and email filing against approved records. Count material corrections, missing decisions, wrong owners, turnaround time, integration failures, permission exceptions, hours saved, and cost per accepted deliverable.
Personal Recommendation
Cogram earns a shortlist for AEC firms with enough documentation volume to justify a specialized platform and a disciplined review process. Smaller practices should prove monthly time savings against the $79 entry price; larger firms should negotiate scope, governance, and deployment terms before rollout.
Try the recommendation
Strong AEC-specific workflow focus
Overall Score
Editorial Review Framework
Overall Score
8.0
Ease of Use
8.2
AI Quality
8.0
Features
8.2
Speed
8.0
Integrations
7.8
Value for Money
8.0
Customer Support
7.6
Learning Curve
7.8
Recommended Because…
Strong AEC-specific workflow focus
Scores use a 0-10 editorial scale: 9–10 exceptional, 8–8.9 strong, 7–7.9 capable with material tradeoffs, 6–6.9 limited fit, and below 6 not recommended. Scores publish only when a documented evaluation supports them.
Reusable trial worksheet
Turn this review’s buyer test into evidence. Your entries autosave only in this browser and are never added to shared shortlist links.
Confirm the tool meets every must-have workflow and stakeholder requirement.
Review starting point: Architecture and engineering project teams; Firms standardizing minutes and field reports; AEC operations requiring controlled project records
Run the same representative work you would use in production; do not score a polished demo.
Review starting point: Complete three to five representative tasks with known acceptable outcomes and compare them with your current process.
Calculate the effective cost per accepted result, including usage, review, corrections, and required add-ons.
Review starting point: Cogram lists an Individual plan at $79 per month with a 14-day trial for its agent, meeting minutes, field reports, email management, RFIs and submittals. Team and firm pricing is modular and sales-led. Verify seats, floating-license rules, modules, storage, integrations, support, and deployment options. Reviewed August 26, 2026.
Define an acceptance threshold, test known answers and edge cases, and record every correction.
Review starting point: Editorial quality signals: features 4.1/5; AI quality 4.0/5. Validate these signals in your own work.
Verify what data enters the product, who can access it, how long it is retained, and whether it trains models.
Review starting point: Use approved low-risk data first. Check roles, consent, deletion, subprocessors, model-training settings, and the contract—not only the marketing page.
Test the real handoffs, permissions, failure states, and export path your team depends on.
Review starting point: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, SAML SSO, Private cloud, On-premises deployment
Record training, governance, reliability, accessibility, ownership, and change-management risks before rollout.
Review starting point: High individual entry price; Team pricing is custom; High-stakes records require human approval
Loading saved worksheet… · private to this device or your optional account
Evaluation
Research-based
Price posture
From $79/month
Reviewed
2026-08-26
No authentic product screenshot is published for this review. DiscoverAI does not use generated interface images as product evidence.
Editorial freshness
Pricing and material product claims were checked August 26, 2026.
Community evidence
Structured, editor-moderated experience—not star ratings. This complements our independent review and never changes its score.
No approved community evidence yet. Be the first verified user to contribute.
Cogram lists an individual plan at $79 per month. Team and firm pricing is modular and provided through sales.
Yes. The individual plan advertises a 14-day free trial; verify current eligibility and module access.
Its privacy policy says meeting audio is transcribed but not stored after transcription, while transcripts are retained to produce notes and action items.
Cogram says it does not use customer data to train AI or machine-learning models. Buyers should verify current contract and subprocessor terms.
Keep Deciding
ChatGPT
The general-purpose AI assistant that started it all
ElevenLabs
A leading AI voice platform for text to speech, voice cloning, speech to text, dubbing, and conversational agents
Sendspark
Create personalized AI video messages that help sales, marketing, recruiting, and customer success teams earn more replies
Recall.ai Review 2026: Meeting Bot API Pricing and Reliability
Recall.ai removes much of the conferencing-integration burden for meeting products, but consent, bot reliability, transcription, storage, regional isolation, and total per-hour cost remain the buyer's responsibility.
Cogram Review 2026: AEC AI, Pricing, Security, and Fit
Cogram targets architecture, engineering, and construction workflows with meeting minutes, field reports, email, and project agents, but its $79 individual entry point and sales-led team packaging demand an outcome-based pilot.
Best AI Voice Generators
The strongest AI voice tools for narration, realism, multilingual output, and production flexibility.
Best AI Voice Cloning Software
The best tools for cloning a voice responsibly, preserving tone, and scaling repeatable narration workflows.
Best AI Text-to-Speech Platforms
A practical shortlist of text-to-speech tools for creators, product teams, educators, and developers.
Productivity & Workflow
AI tools for task management, automation, note-taking, and workflow optimization.
Material changes only
Get an occasional email when something decision-relevant changes. This is separate from the weekly newsletter.
See how similar tools stack up
An AI meeting assistant for transcription, summaries, search, action items, analytics, and follow-up
Fireflies can turn meetings into searchable follow-up, but consent, transcript accuracy, storage, AI credits, retention, and plan-specific governance determine whether it belongs in every call.
Granola is a bot-free AI notepad that captures device audio, combines a transcript with a user's notes, and produces searchable meeting summaries
Granola is a bot-free AI notepad that captures device audio, combines a transcript with a user's notes, and produces searchable meeting summaries.
Workplace AI grounded in Microsoft 365 apps, organizational data, and governed agents
Microsoft Copilot is strongest for organizations already operating in Microsoft 365, but licensing, permission hygiene, content quality, agent usage, and change management determine the return.