Open-source enterprise search and AI assistants across workplace knowledge
Who should use this?
Organizations with fragmented internal knowledge and Teams requiring permission-aware search.
Who should avoid it?
Teams without a connector and security owner, High-stakes answers without source review
What problem does it solve?
Onyx connects workplace repositories to cited search, chat, and agents with source permissions, but connector coverage, ACL fidelity, retrieval quality, and deployment ownership need a controlled pilot.
Would I recommend it?
Onyx earns a shortlist for technically owned, permission-sensitive knowledge search. Pilot one bounded department first and make ACL fidelity, evidence quality, and recovery—not demo fluency—the acceptance gates.
Advisor score
Premium review framework
Onyx connects workplace repositories to cited search, chat, and agents with source permissions, but connector coverage, ACL fidelity, retrieval quality, and deployment ownership need a controlled pilot.
Onyx earns a shortlist for technically owned, permission-sensitive knowledge search. Pilot one bounded department first and make ACL fidelity, evidence quality, and recovery—not demo fluency—the acceptance gates.
Create a synthetic corpus across three repositories with conflicting versions, revoked users, nested groups, sensitive decoys, and known answers. Run 100 queries and record recall, citation accuracy, stale-source selection, forbidden retrieval, ACL update latency, connector failure behavior, deletion, model data paths, and operator hours.
Personal Recommendation
Onyx earns a shortlist for technically owned, permission-sensitive knowledge search. Pilot one bounded department first and make ACL fidelity, evidence quality, and recovery—not demo fluency—the acceptance gates.
Try the recommendation
Open-source deployment path
Overall Score
Editorial Review Framework
Who should use this?
Organizations with fragmented internal knowledge, Teams requiring permission-aware search, Technical buyers wanting a self-hosted option.
Who should avoid it?
Teams without a connector and security owner, High-stakes answers without source review
What problem does it solve?
Onyx connects workplace repositories to cited search, chat, and agents with source permissions, but connector coverage, ACL fidelity, retrieval quality, and deployment ownership need a controlled pilot.
Would I recommend it?
Onyx earns a shortlist for technically owned, permission-sensitive knowledge search. Pilot one bounded department first and make ACL fidelity, evidence quality, and recovery—not demo fluency—the acceptance gates.
Overall Score
8.0
Ease of Use
7.8
AI Quality
8.0
Features
8.4
Speed
8.0
Integrations
8.4
Value for Money
8.0
Customer Support
7.6
Learning Curve
7.4
Recommended Because…
Open-source deployment path
Scores use a 0-10 editorial scale. The source data is maintained as 5-point review dimensions, then normalized for reader-friendly comparison.
Evaluation
Research-based
Price posture
freemium
Reviewed
2026-09-01
No authentic product screenshot is published for this review. DiscoverAI does not use generated interface images as product evidence.
Onyx publishes its core enterprise-search project for self-hosting, while managed and enterprise packaging is sales-led rather than represented by a stable public dollar table. Self-hosters still pay for infrastructure, models, storage, connectors, monitoring, upgrades, and support. Confirm current commercial terms before purchase. Reviewed September 1, 2026.
Free plan: Yes. The open-source edition can be self-hosted, subject to its current license and the buyer's infrastructure and model costs.
Yes. Onyx publishes a self-hosted open-source edition; commercial managed and enterprise services are separate.
Onyx says it syncs source ACLs and document permissions. Buyers should test revocation and group-change latency against their own connectors.
A stable public managed-service price table was not available in the reviewed official material. Self-hosting has infrastructure and model costs; enterprise terms require confirmation.
Its self-hosted and enterprise materials support buyer-controlled deployment and model choices, but every configured provider must be mapped.
Keep Deciding
Best AI Research Tools
Research tools for cited answers, academic papers, market research, and knowledge synthesis.
Best AI Tools for Consultants & Coaches (2026)
The best AI tools for proposals, meeting summaries, client notes, course creation, marketing, and turning expertise into reusable content.
Best AI Tools for Researchers (2026)
The best AI research tools for literature discovery, source-grounded synthesis, citation checking, controlled document analysis, and clearer academic writing.
Research
AI tools for cited answers, literature review, market research, and knowledge synthesis.
See how similar tools stack up
A collaborative platform for building governed AI agents on company knowledge and tools
Dust gives teams flexible models, connectors, agents, and governance, but credit consumption, connector scope, permissions, retrieval quality, and enterprise plan boundaries need a real workload test.
An open-source local and self-hosted AI workspace for documents, agents, and teams
AnythingLLM packages local models, document knowledge, agents, meeting notes, and multi-user workspaces into desktop, Docker, and hosted options, but privacy depends on deployment, model endpoints, plugins, and operational discipline.
A self-hosted multi-user AI interface for local, private, and third-party models
Open WebUI gives teams one customizable interface for local and hosted models, knowledge, tools, permissions, and enterprise deployment, but security, licensing, operator access, and model data paths remain the deployer's responsibility.